Home About Us Feedback Download
     Advanced Search  
March 15, 2010
 India
National
Politics
Business
Sports
Sci-Tech
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Religion
Art - Culture
Diaspora
Education
 International
Pakistan
Rest of South Asia
Asia
Americas
Europe
Australasia
Gulf-Middle East
Africa
World
 Business:
 ASIA | US | EUROPE
 updated 1330 IST
 NIKKEI -2 11488 
 HANG SENG +51 13846 
 NEC -9 4164 
  Home » National   E-mail this to a friend   Printable version
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apex court suspends order on relief to Narmada dam displaced
11/20/2009 6:52:00 PM

New Delhi, Nov 20 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday suspended a Madhya Pradesh High Court order directing the state government to give land to the adult children of those displaced by the Indira Sagar dam project on Narmada river.

A bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice J.M. Panchal, while suspending the Sep 2 order of the Jabalpur bench of the high court, also issued notices to the Narmada Bachao Andolan, whose lawsuit had yielded the high court order.

The high court had asked the state government to allocate two hectares of land to each of the adult sons and unmarried daughters of the people displaced by the dam project within three months from Sep 2. The deadline expired Nov 2.

The high court asked the state government to give the land saying that another bench of the court had issued the direction in Sep 8, 2006.

In its September order this year, the high court also warned the state government it could face contempt proceedings if it failed to give the land to the dam oustees within the stipulated time.

The apex court bench suspended the high court order on two separate lawsuits - one by the Madhya Pradesh government and the other by the Narmada Valley Development Authority and the Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation.

The government, the NVDA and the NHDC have come to the court contending that the high court had directed allocation of land to the displaced despite the fact that their lawsuit challenging the high court's original order of 2006 stands challenged before the apex court, which is yet to take a call on the issue.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    E-mail this to a friend   Printable version
Top News
  More than 10,000 evacuated in Fij ...
  Sehwag guides Daredevils to a six ...
  Scoreboard: Delhi Daredevils vs. ...
  Royal Challengers hope to bounce ...
  Punjab flags off motorcycle highw ...
  Delhi Daredevils win by six wicke ...
  Probe into swarm of bees at Mayaw ...
  'Vaccine shots to infants in Madh ...
  Bail plea of publisher in Jesus b ...
  Orissa legislators demand ten-fol ...
 
World News
  Coalmine fire kills 25 in China
  US unveils new broadband plan
  World's shortest man dies
  EU and US pledge unity over regul ...
  Netanyahu defends Jerusalem build ...
  Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes separ ...
  Obama says lawmakers need 'courag ...
  'Titanic' success made me want to ...
  Being single okay but I miss sex: ...
  Madonna seeks Queen Elizabeth's n ...
 
Advertisement 


South Asian Videos
Bollywood On Demand
India On Demand
Tollywood On Demand
Kollywood On Demand
Hollywood Videos
India User Videos
Realtors India
Indian Friends
Indian Short Films
Post Classifieds
Bollywood Pictures
Hindi Lyrics
Hindi Songs
Bollywood Photos
Indian Videos
India Greetings
Play Games Online
Indian Recipes
National|Politics|Business|Sports|Sci-Tech|Entertainment|Travel|Health|Religion|Art - Culture|Diaspora|Education|
Pakistan|Rest of South Asia|Asia|Americas|Europe|Australasia|Gulf-Middle East|Africa|World|
Help | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Publishers

©2009 southasianews.com, All Rights Reserved